Author

admin

Browsing

Dominique Pélicot, the convicted rapist who horrified France by drugging his then wife so other men could rape her, was questioned Thursday about other cases of rape and murder that he’s suspected in.

Pélicot is serving a 20-year prison term after he was found guilty in December for the horrific sexual abuse of his now ex-wife, Gisèle Pélicot.

His lawyer told The Associated Press that he now faces renewed questioning by an investigating magistrate who specializes in so-called cold cases – those that have proved particularly hard to resolve.

The rape and murder cases date back to the 1990s. One involves Sophie Narme, a property agent who was killed in Paris on December 4, 1991. His lawyer, Béatrice Zavarro, said Dominique Pélicot denies any involvement in the killing.

The other is the attempted armed rape of another property agent in the Paris suburb of Villeparisis on May 11, 1999. In that case, Pélicot acknowledges that he met the woman and tried to undress her but denies attempted rape, his lawyer said.

Dominique Pélicot has been under formal investigation for both of those crimes since October 2022 – a legal status meaning that investigators believe there is an accumulation of serious evidence against him.

Lawyer Florence Rault, who represents Narme’s family and the woman subjected to the rape attempt, said an array of similarities between the 1991 and 1999 cases suggested the perpetrator might be the same in both.

“One has to remain cautious. Perhaps someone else committed the crime on Sophie Narme. But there are such similarities in the mode of operation, in the way the victims were approached – and the victims are so identical, too – that one can legitimately ask many questions,” Rault said on RTL radio.

The two cases were grouped together into one investigation in September 2022 that was taken over by the specialized unit for cold cases and serial crimes. It works out of the Paris suburb of Nanterre.

Speaking on her way into Dominique Pélicot’s hearing with the investigating magistrate at the Nanterre cold-case unit, Zavarro said he plans to cooperate but that she didn’t know what questions he’d face. She noted that he had previously been questioned in October 2023 and had acknowledged having been in contact with the property agent in the 1999 case, but not with Sophie Narme.

“He says that he is totally unconnected with the events related to Sophie Narme,” Zavarro said. “He has always said that he never met Sophie Narme.”

Zavarro said Dominique Pélicot has acknowledged to investigators that he met the other property agent. The lawyer said police found traces of his DNA at the scene of their meeting.

“He acknowledged having been in contact with this young woman. His DNA is there, so there’s no issue there. He acknowledged having had an altercation with her, having tried to undress her, but with intentions different from attempted rape,” she said.

The rape and murder cases occurred more than 10 years before the drugging and rapes of Gisèle Pélicot for which Pélicot and 50 other men were convicted – a nearly decade-long stretch of sexual abuse from 2011. He knocked her unconscious by lacing her food and drink with drugs and invited other men he met online to rape her.

Gisèle Pelicot became a hero to many in France and beyond for courageously demanding that the men’s trial be held in open court.

The evidence included stomach-churning homemade videos of the abuse that Dominique Pélicot filmed in the couple’s retirement home in the small Provence town of Mazan and elsewhere. Police subsequently found more than 20,000 photos and videos in all, stored on computer drives and catalogued in folders marked “abuse,” “her rapists,” “night alone” and other titles.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

Catherine, Princess of Wales continued her phased return to public duties on Thursday, visiting a children’s hospice in Wales, as it was announced that she’d become a patron of the organization.

Tŷ Hafan was the first children’s hospice in Wales when it opened in 1999. Based in the village of Sully, near Cardiff, the charity provides care and support to children with life-shortening conditions, as well as their families.

During her visit, the princess spent time with children receiving care at the hospice and joined a “stay and play” session with them, according to Kensington Palace.

She also met with bereaved families supported by the hospice. The charity provides holistic support, focusing on the physical, emotional, social and spiritual needs of the children and their families, Kensington Palace said.

Irfon Rees, chief executive of Tŷ Hafan, said it was an “absolute pleasure” to welcome the princess to the hospice.

“As our Patron, Her Royal Highness will be an inspiration for children with life-shortening conditions and their families, our dedicated staff and volunteers and everyone who so generously supports us,” Rees added in a statement.

Catherine is not the only royal patron of the hospice. King Charles III became patron in 2001, when he was Prince of Wales, and Diana, Princess of Wales was a patron while the charity was in its fundraising stage.

Thursday’s visit follows Catherine’s first solo engagement of the year and marks part of her phased return to public duties.

GET OUR FREE ROYAL NEWSLETTER

    Catherine, who is also known as Kate, stepped back from her public duties last year to undergo treatment for an unspecified cancer.

    In September, she announced that she had completed her chemotherapy and said she was “doing what I can to stay cancer free.”

    On Monday evening, Kate joined her husband, Prince William, for a surprise appearance at official commemorations in the UK to mark Holocaust Memorial Day and the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau.

    Kate held hands and affectionately hugged Holocaust survivors at the event in central London.

    Meanwhile, Kate earlier this month visited The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust in Chelsea, west London, where she met with medical teams and spoke to patients receiving treatment, according to Kensington Palace.

    Following her visit that day, Kate revealed on social media that she was in remission from cancer.

    “As anyone who has experienced a cancer diagnosis will know, it takes time to adjust to a new normal,” the 43-year-old said in a post on X. “I am however looking forward to a fulfilling year ahead. There is much to look forward to. Thank you to everyone for your continued support.”

    This post appeared first on cnn.com

    HIGHLIGHTS:

    • 5.0m grading 9.69 g/t gold
    • 4.3m grading 9.87 g/t gold
    • 15.0m grading 2.54 g/t gold
    • 11.65m grading 1.86 g/t gold
    • 11.6m grading 1.72 g/t gold
    • 21.6m grading 0.77 g/t gold
    • Continued success from assay results from shallow drilling in areas considered to be waste within the Creston Pit Expansion
    • Higher Grade intercepts demonstrate underground potential beyond the current open pit

    Heliostar Metals Ltd. (TSXV: HSTR) (OTCQX: HSTXF) (FSE: RGG1) (‘Heliostar’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce additional results from a 12,500-metre drilling program at the La Colorada Mine in Sonora, Mexico. La Colorada restarted production in early January 2025, and the current drill program is intended to expand the mineral reserves ahead of a Feasibility Study and expansion decision planned for mid-2025.

    Heliostar CEO, Charles Funk, commented, ‘At La Colorada, we are seeing the combined benefit of gold production at record prices and growth from the first significant investment into the project in many years. Our aggressive five-rig drill program is designed to increase the reserves of the Creston pit. Success to date in the shallow part of the pit could lower the upfront capital costs presented in the January 13th Technical Report. The Company will use the results of this drill program to finalize a Feasibility Study in mid-2025 and then make an expansion decision on La Colorada to 50,000-100,000 ounces per year of annual production. We are also hitting high grades and widths and deeper intercepts could drive underground mining optionality beyond the open pit. We will further test this target with additional drilling in this current drill program.’

    Drill Results Summary

    Mineralization at La Colorada’s Creston Pit is predominantly hosted in three veins: the North, Intermediate and South Veins (Figure 1). These veins trend northeast-southwest to east-west, dip northward and are surrounded by halos of smaller mineralized vein zones. The Creston Pit has historically mined oxide gold and silver from all three of these veins. A current Mineral Reserves of 312,000 ounces of gold grading 0.76 grams per tonne (g/t) gold and 10.1 g/t silver is defined at the Creston Pit1.

    Reviewing the expansion potential revealed two opportunities for reserve growth: near surface extensions of known veins where little or no drilling had been completed and upgrading and expanding mineralization beneath the pit. Both opportunities were defined using historical drilling, blasthole data, mining shapes, and the geological model.

    High-density blast hole data strongly emphasizes the potential for a continuation of veins at shallow depth, defining elevated gold grades that continue to the edge of the pit walls where they remain open for expansion (Figure 1).

    Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/238940_54a65b22c4f31a5e_003.jpg

    Figure 1: Plan view of the Creston Pit showing historic drilling, blast hole samples and Heliostar drillholes. Selected intercepts are labelled.

    To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
    https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/238940_54a65b22c4f31a5e_003full.jpg

    Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/238940_54a65b22c4f31a5e_004.jpg

    Figure 2: Cross-section view of the eastern end of the Creston Pit highlighting the lack of previous drilling beyond the pit boundary. The section shows historic drilling, new Heliostar drillhole results and pit boundary for pit expansion.

    To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
    https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/238940_54a65b22c4f31a5e_004full.jpg

    Forty-seven holes have been completed in the program to date, with results reported for twenty-three new holes in this release. A total of 6,452 metres have been completed to date in the program. The majority of the new drill holes targeted shallow extensions of the North, Intermediate and South Veins in areas considered to be waste in the reserve estimate of the current Technical Report. Additionally, today’s results include deeper holes beneath the current pit. These holes target the growth of reserves deeper within the planned pit expansion. They aim to add ounces to the overall El Creston resources and reserves.

    The results show narrow to wide, low to high-grade oxide gold intercepts. They consistently return intercepts above the 0.16 g/t gold cutoff grade of reserves within the Creston pit. The results suggest that areas of waste could be converted to ore in an updated reserve model.

    High-grade intercepts deeper in the pit indicate the potential for mineralization that may be amenable to underground mining beyond the current pit boundary. The Company will follow-up on these results to assess the potential to extend mine life with mineralization amenable to underground mining beneath and to the west of the Creston Pit.

    Next Steps

    Results from the current drill program will be incorporated into a resource model and support a reserve update to be published with a Feasibility Study in mid-2025.

    Should the drilling define a material volume of gold mineralization, this program has the potential to reduce the overall strip ratio of the Crestón pit expansion, which could result in a reduction in up-front capital requirements for the restart and improve the economics of the Feasibility Study. This study will be the basis of a decision for the expansion of production at La Colorada in mid-2025.

    The Company anticipates additional drilling results from the current program will be released in Q1 and Q2, 2025.

    La Colorada Mineral Reserves Statement

    Classification Zone AuEq Cut-off (g/t) Tonnes (kt) Gold Grade
    (g/t Au)
    Silver Grade (g/t Ag) Contained Gold
    (koz)
    Contained Silver
    (koz)
    Probable El Crestón 0.160 12,841 0.76 10.1 312 4,181
    Veta Madre 0.175 1,905 0.70 3.1 43 189
    La Chatarrera 0.164 3,413 0.20 6.4 22 704
    Total 18,159 0.65 8.69 377 5,074

     

    1 La Colorada Operations, Sonora, Mexico, NI 43-101 Technical Report (the ‘Report’) is dated January 11, 2024, has an effective date of December 4, 2024

    Drilling Results Table

    HoleID From
    (metres)
    To
    (metres)
    Interval
    (metres)
    Au
    (g/t)
    Ag
    (g/t)
    % True
    Width
    Comment
    24-LCDD-238 342.4 354.0 11.6 1.72 3.7 89 Intermediate Vein
    24-LCDD-239 No significant intervals
    24-LCDD-240 157.0 177.05 20.05 0.38 3.3 72 South Vein
    24-LCDD-241 81.25 86.0 4.75 0.49 158 93 South Vein
    24-LCDD-242 96.9 99.5 2.60 3.07 3.7 55 South Vein
    24-LCDD-243 98.2 101.35 3.15 0.19 20.3 94 South Vein
    24-LCDD-244 151.8 158.7 6.90 2.38 9.8 97 North Vein
    and 179.2 183.5 4.30 9.87 6.8 98 Intermediate Vein
    179.2 183.5 4.30 8.88 6.8 98 Top-cut to 23 g/t gold
    24-LCDD-245 13.45 17.25 3.80 6.28 4.3 100 South Vein
    13.45 17.25 3.80 3.95 4.3 100 Top-cut to 23 g/t gold
    24-LCDD-246 63.95 76.85 12.9 0.39 46.4 93 South Vein
    24-LCDD-247 64.0 67.0 3.00 0.24 5.0 80 South Vein
    24-LCDD-248 66.85 73.8 6.95 0.18 1.0 27 South Vein
    and 98.5 103 4.50 0.66 3.1 9 South Vein
    24-LCDD-249 55.0 61.55 6.55 0.44 39.0 82 South Vein
    24-LCDD-250 16.35 22.2 5.85 0.16 3.8 97 Intermediate Vein
    and 45.85 53.0 7.15 0.22 4.0 97 South Vein
    24-LCDD-251 263.4 285 21.6 0.77 9.0 93 North Vein
    and 439.35 454.35 15.0 2.54 7.5 89 Intermediate Vein
    and 492.45 528.45 36.0 0.35 2.8 99 South Vein
    24-LCDD-252 No significant intervals
    24-LCDD-253 14.5 21.65 7.15 0.22 1.0 94 Intermediate Vein
    and 31.0 56.8 25.8 0.35 4.4 100 South Vein
    24-LCDD-254 35.0 43.25 8.25 0.49 9.7 90 Intermediate Vein
    and 59.0 64.0 5.00 9.69 62.0 81 Intermediate Vein
    59.0 64.0 5.00 2.89 62.0 81 Top-cut to 23 g/t gold
    and 104.45 128 23.55 0.53 8.3 62 Intermediate Vein
    24-LCDD-255 30.6 39.25 8.65 0.28 3.1 91 South Vein
    and 50.5 53.05 2.55 0.31 1.4 98 South Vein
    24-LCDD-256 110.95 112.65 1.70 0.64 5.7 76 South Vein
    24-LCDD-257 198.45 209.5 11.05 1.07 23.3 74 North Vein
    24-LCDD-258 11.0 24.0 13.0 0.28 4.0 72 Intermediate Vein
    and 43.25 54.9 11.65 1.86 5.5 71 South Vein
    24-LCDD-259 28.95 34.4 5.45 0.47 5.2 23 South Vein
    and 104.15 116.5 12.35 0.93 6.3 61 South Vein
    24-LCDD-260 No significant intervals
    24-LCDD-261 No significant intervals

     

    Table 1: Significant Drill Intersections. Holes 24-LCDD-239 and 24-LCDD-241 have been previously reported.

    Drilling Coordinates Table

    Hole ID Northing
    (NAD27 CONUS
    Zone 12N)
    Easting
    (NAD27 CONUS
    Zone 12N)
    Elevation
    (metres)
    Azimuth
    (°)
    Inclination
    (°)
    Length
    (metres)
    24-LCDD-242 3185533 542700 396.5 000 -49 141.7
    24-LCDD-243 3185622 542106 451.7 152 -48 147.4
    24-LCDD-244 3185955 542999 469.0 180 -41 267.75
    24-LCDD-245 3185692 542986 411.7 210 -60 100.65
    24-LCDD-246 3185649 542215 376.4 180 -50 95.4
    24-LCDD-247 3185704 542990 411.9 210 -75 80.0
    24-LCDD-248 3185616 542950 411.8 000 -43 107.85
    24-LCDD-249 3185629 542198 378.0 192 -57 109.2
    24-LCDD-250 3185664 542700 271.6 180 -0 119.0
    24-LCDD-251 3186089 542750 472.4 180 -53 551.65
    24-LCDD-252 3185739 543075 438.5 180 -40 89.7
    24-LCDD-253 3185666 542665 266.1 180 -29 84.45
    24-LCDD-254 3185849 542700 238.8 180 -66 217.15
    24-LCDD-255 3185691 542775 278.6 180 -10 75.95
    24-LCDD-256 3185467 542672 406.2 355 -50 164.45
    24-LCDD-257 3185911 542415 343.0 180 -58 278.45
    24-LCDD-258 3185691 542775 279.6 180 -15 78.3
    24-LCDD-259 3185529 542725 396.3 000 -41 132.45
    24-LCDD-260 3185686 542750 276.6 180 -7 81.75
    24-LCDD-261 3185717 543050 437.5 180 -40 52.45
    24-LCDD-262 3185676 542725 273.8 180 -15 98.25
    24-LCDD-263 3185570 542775 389.8 000 -42 47.25
    24-LCDD-264 3185834 542291 356.6 180 -51 279.95

     

    Table 2: Drill Hole Details

    Quality Assurance / Quality Control

    Core samples were shipped to ALS Limited in Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico, for sample preparation and for analysis at the ALS laboratory in North Vancouver. The Hermosillo and North Vancouver ALS facilities are ISO/IEC 17025 certified. Gold was assayed by 30-gram fire assay with atomic absorption spectroscopy finish and overlimits were analysed by 30-gram fire assay with gravimetric finish.

    Control samples comprising certified reference and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company’s quality assurance / quality control protocol.

    Statement of Qualified Person

    Gregg Bush, P.Eng. and Stewart Harris, P.Geo., the Company’s Qualified Persons, as such term is defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, have reviewed the scientific and technical information that forms the basis for this news release and has approved the disclosure herein. Mr. Bush is employed as Chief Operating Officer of the Company and Mr. Harris is employed as Exploration Manager of the Company.

    Technical Report Reference

    1 La Colorada Operations, Sonora, Mexico, NI 43-101 Technical Report (the ‘Report’) is dated January 11, 2024, has an effective date of December 4, 2024, and was prepared for Heliostar Metals Inc. by Mr. Todd Wakefield, RM SME, Mr. David Thomas, P.Geo., Mr. Jeffrey Choquette, P.E., Mr. Carl Defilippi, RM SME, and Ms. Dawn Garcia, CPG. The Report can be found under the Company’s profile on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) and on Heliostar’s website (www.heliostarmetals.com).

    About Heliostar Metals Ltd.

    Heliostar is a gold producer with production from operating mines in Mexico. This includes the La Colorada Mine in Sonora and San Agustin Mine in Durango. The Company also has a strong portfolio of development projects in Mexico and the USA. These include the Ana Paula project in Guerrero, the Cerro del Gallo project in Guanajuato, the San Antonio project in Baja Sur and the Unga project in Alaska, USA.

    FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:

    Charles Funk
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    Heliostar Metals Limited
    Email: charles.funk@heliostarmetals.com
    Phone: +1 844-753-0045

    Rob Grey
    Investor Relations Manager
    Heliostar Metals Limited
    Email: rob.grey@heliostarmetals.com
    Phone: +1 844-753-0045

     

    Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

    This news release includes certain ‘Forward-Looking Statements’ within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and ‘forward-looking information’ under applicable Canadian securities laws. When used in this news release, the words ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘target’, ‘plan’, ‘forecast’, ‘may’, ‘would’, ‘could’, ‘schedule’ and similar words or expressions, identify forward-looking statements or information. These forward-looking statements or information relate to, among other things, Continued success from assay results from shallow drilling in areas considered to be waste within the Creston Pit Expansion, Higher Grade intercepts demonstrate underground potential beyond the current open pit, the benefit of gold production at record prices, growth from the first significant investment into the project in many years, success to date in the shallow part of the pit could lower the upfront capital costs presented in the January 13th Technical Report, the Company will use the results of this drill program to finalize a Feasibility Study in mid-2025 and then make a decision to expand La Colorada to 50,000-100,000 ounces per year of annual production, hitting high grades and widths deeper intercepts could drive underground mining optionality beyond the open pit.

    Forward-looking statements and forward-looking information relating to the terms and completion of the Facility, any future mineral production, liquidity, and future exploration plans are based on management’s reasonable assumptions, estimates, expectations, analyses and opinions, which are based on management’s experience and perception of trends, current conditions and expected developments, and other factors that management believes are relevant and reasonable in the circumstances, but which may prove to be incorrect. Assumptions have been made regarding, among other things, the receipt of necessary approvals, price of metals; no escalation in the severity of public health crises or ongoing military conflicts; costs of exploration and development; the estimated costs of development of exploration projects; and the Company’s ability to operate in a safe and effective manner and its ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms.

    These statements reflect the Company’s respective current views with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon a number of other assumptions and estimates that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, political, and social uncertainties and contingencies. Many factors, both known and unknown, could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance or achievements that are or may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or forward-looking information and the Company has made assumptions and estimates based on or related to many of these factors. Such factors include, without limitation: precious metals price volatility; risks associated with the conduct of the Company’s mining activities in foreign jurisdictions; regulatory, consent or permitting delays; risks relating to reliance on the Company’s management team and outside contractors; risks regarding exploration and mining activities; the Company’s inability to obtain insurance to cover all risks, on a commercially reasonable basis or at all; currency fluctuations; risks regarding the failure to generate sufficient cash flow from operations; risks relating to project financing and equity issuances; risks and unknowns inherent in all mining projects, including the inaccuracy of reserves and resources, metallurgical recoveries and capital and operating costs of such projects; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties; laws and regulations governing the environment, health and safety; the ability of the communities in which the Company operates to manage and cope with the implications of public health crises; the economic and financial implications of public health crises, ongoing military conflicts and general economic factors to the Company; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities; employee relations, labour unrest or unavailability; the Company’s interactions with surrounding communities; the Company’s ability to successfully integrate acquired assets; the speculative nature of exploration and development, including the risks of diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; stock market volatility; conflicts of interest among certain directors and officers; lack of liquidity for shareholders of the Company; litigation risk; and the factors identified under the caption ‘Risk Factors’ in the Company’s public disclosure documents. Readers are cautioned against attributing undue certainty to forward-looking statements or forward-looking information. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended. The Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements or forward-looking information to reflect changes in assumptions or changes in circumstances or any other events affecting such statements or information, other than as required by applicable law.

    Corporate Logo

    To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/238940

    News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    HIGHLIGHTS:

    • 5.0m grading 9.69 g/t gold
    • 4.3m grading 9.87 g/t gold
    • 15.0m grading 2.54 g/t gold
    • 11.65m grading 1.86 g/t gold
    • 11.6m grading 1.72 g/t gold
    • 21.6m grading 0.77 g/t gold
    • Continued success from assay results from shallow drilling in areas considered to be waste within the Creston Pit Expansion
    • Higher Grade intercepts demonstrate underground potential beyond the current open pit

    Heliostar Metals Ltd. (TSXV: HSTR) (OTCQX: HSTXF) (FSE: RGG1) (‘Heliostar’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce additional results from a 12,500-metre drilling program at the La Colorada Mine in Sonora, Mexico. La Colorada restarted production in early January 2025, and the current drill program is intended to expand the mineral reserves ahead of a Feasibility Study and expansion decision planned for mid-2025.

    Heliostar CEO, Charles Funk, commented, ‘At La Colorada, we are seeing the combined benefit of gold production at record prices and growth from the first significant investment into the project in many years. Our aggressive five-rig drill program is designed to increase the reserves of the Creston pit. Success to date in the shallow part of the pit could lower the upfront capital costs presented in the January 13th Technical Report. The Company will use the results of this drill program to finalize a Feasibility Study in mid-2025 and then make an expansion decision on La Colorada to 50,000-100,000 ounces per year of annual production. We are also hitting high grades and widths and deeper intercepts could drive underground mining optionality beyond the open pit. We will further test this target with additional drilling in this current drill program.’

    Drill Results Summary

    Mineralization at La Colorada’s Creston Pit is predominantly hosted in three veins: the North, Intermediate and South Veins (Figure 1). These veins trend northeast-southwest to east-west, dip northward and are surrounded by halos of smaller mineralized vein zones. The Creston Pit has historically mined oxide gold and silver from all three of these veins. A current Mineral Reserves of 312,000 ounces of gold grading 0.76 grams per tonne (g/t) gold and 10.1 g/t silver is defined at the Creston Pit1.

    Reviewing the expansion potential revealed two opportunities for reserve growth: near surface extensions of known veins where little or no drilling had been completed and upgrading and expanding mineralization beneath the pit. Both opportunities were defined using historical drilling, blasthole data, mining shapes, and the geological model.

    High-density blast hole data strongly emphasizes the potential for a continuation of veins at shallow depth, defining elevated gold grades that continue to the edge of the pit walls where they remain open for expansion (Figure 1).

    Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/238940_54a65b22c4f31a5e_003.jpg

    Figure 1: Plan view of the Creston Pit showing historic drilling, blast hole samples and Heliostar drillholes. Selected intercepts are labelled.

    To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
    https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/238940_54a65b22c4f31a5e_003full.jpg

    Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/238940_54a65b22c4f31a5e_004.jpg

    Figure 2: Cross-section view of the eastern end of the Creston Pit highlighting the lack of previous drilling beyond the pit boundary. The section shows historic drilling, new Heliostar drillhole results and pit boundary for pit expansion.

    To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
    https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/238940_54a65b22c4f31a5e_004full.jpg

    Forty-seven holes have been completed in the program to date, with results reported for twenty-three new holes in this release. A total of 6,452 metres have been completed to date in the program. The majority of the new drill holes targeted shallow extensions of the North, Intermediate and South Veins in areas considered to be waste in the reserve estimate of the current Technical Report. Additionally, today’s results include deeper holes beneath the current pit. These holes target the growth of reserves deeper within the planned pit expansion. They aim to add ounces to the overall El Creston resources and reserves.

    The results show narrow to wide, low to high-grade oxide gold intercepts. They consistently return intercepts above the 0.16 g/t gold cutoff grade of reserves within the Creston pit. The results suggest that areas of waste could be converted to ore in an updated reserve model.

    High-grade intercepts deeper in the pit indicate the potential for mineralization that may be amenable to underground mining beyond the current pit boundary. The Company will follow-up on these results to assess the potential to extend mine life with mineralization amenable to underground mining beneath and to the west of the Creston Pit.

    Next Steps

    Results from the current drill program will be incorporated into a resource model and support a reserve update to be published with a Feasibility Study in mid-2025.

    Should the drilling define a material volume of gold mineralization, this program has the potential to reduce the overall strip ratio of the Crestón pit expansion, which could result in a reduction in up-front capital requirements for the restart and improve the economics of the Feasibility Study. This study will be the basis of a decision for the expansion of production at La Colorada in mid-2025.

    The Company anticipates additional drilling results from the current program will be released in Q1 and Q2, 2025.

    La Colorada Mineral Reserves Statement

    Classification Zone AuEq Cut-off (g/t) Tonnes (kt) Gold Grade
    (g/t Au)
    Silver Grade (g/t Ag) Contained Gold
    (koz)
    Contained Silver
    (koz)
    Probable El Crestón 0.160 12,841 0.76 10.1 312 4,181
    Veta Madre 0.175 1,905 0.70 3.1 43 189
    La Chatarrera 0.164 3,413 0.20 6.4 22 704
    Total 18,159 0.65 8.69 377 5,074

     

    1 La Colorada Operations, Sonora, Mexico, NI 43-101 Technical Report (the ‘Report’) is dated January 11, 2024, has an effective date of December 4, 2024

    Drilling Results Table

    HoleID From
    (metres)
    To
    (metres)
    Interval
    (metres)
    Au
    (g/t)
    Ag
    (g/t)
    % True
    Width
    Comment
    24-LCDD-238 342.4 354.0 11.6 1.72 3.7 89 Intermediate Vein
    24-LCDD-239 No significant intervals
    24-LCDD-240 157.0 177.05 20.05 0.38 3.3 72 South Vein
    24-LCDD-241 81.25 86.0 4.75 0.49 158 93 South Vein
    24-LCDD-242 96.9 99.5 2.60 3.07 3.7 55 South Vein
    24-LCDD-243 98.2 101.35 3.15 0.19 20.3 94 South Vein
    24-LCDD-244 151.8 158.7 6.90 2.38 9.8 97 North Vein
    and 179.2 183.5 4.30 9.87 6.8 98 Intermediate Vein
    179.2 183.5 4.30 8.88 6.8 98 Top-cut to 23 g/t gold
    24-LCDD-245 13.45 17.25 3.80 6.28 4.3 100 South Vein
    13.45 17.25 3.80 3.95 4.3 100 Top-cut to 23 g/t gold
    24-LCDD-246 63.95 76.85 12.9 0.39 46.4 93 South Vein
    24-LCDD-247 64.0 67.0 3.00 0.24 5.0 80 South Vein
    24-LCDD-248 66.85 73.8 6.95 0.18 1.0 27 South Vein
    and 98.5 103 4.50 0.66 3.1 9 South Vein
    24-LCDD-249 55.0 61.55 6.55 0.44 39.0 82 South Vein
    24-LCDD-250 16.35 22.2 5.85 0.16 3.8 97 Intermediate Vein
    and 45.85 53.0 7.15 0.22 4.0 97 South Vein
    24-LCDD-251 263.4 285 21.6 0.77 9.0 93 North Vein
    and 439.35 454.35 15.0 2.54 7.5 89 Intermediate Vein
    and 492.45 528.45 36.0 0.35 2.8 99 South Vein
    24-LCDD-252 No significant intervals
    24-LCDD-253 14.5 21.65 7.15 0.22 1.0 94 Intermediate Vein
    and 31.0 56.8 25.8 0.35 4.4 100 South Vein
    24-LCDD-254 35.0 43.25 8.25 0.49 9.7 90 Intermediate Vein
    and 59.0 64.0 5.00 9.69 62.0 81 Intermediate Vein
    59.0 64.0 5.00 2.89 62.0 81 Top-cut to 23 g/t gold
    and 104.45 128 23.55 0.53 8.3 62 Intermediate Vein
    24-LCDD-255 30.6 39.25 8.65 0.28 3.1 91 South Vein
    and 50.5 53.05 2.55 0.31 1.4 98 South Vein
    24-LCDD-256 110.95 112.65 1.70 0.64 5.7 76 South Vein
    24-LCDD-257 198.45 209.5 11.05 1.07 23.3 74 North Vein
    24-LCDD-258 11.0 24.0 13.0 0.28 4.0 72 Intermediate Vein
    and 43.25 54.9 11.65 1.86 5.5 71 South Vein
    24-LCDD-259 28.95 34.4 5.45 0.47 5.2 23 South Vein
    and 104.15 116.5 12.35 0.93 6.3 61 South Vein
    24-LCDD-260 No significant intervals
    24-LCDD-261 No significant intervals

     

    Table 1: Significant Drill Intersections. Holes 24-LCDD-239 and 24-LCDD-241 have been previously reported.

    Drilling Coordinates Table

    Hole ID Northing
    (NAD27 CONUS
    Zone 12N)
    Easting
    (NAD27 CONUS
    Zone 12N)
    Elevation
    (metres)
    Azimuth
    (°)
    Inclination
    (°)
    Length
    (metres)
    24-LCDD-242 3185533 542700 396.5 000 -49 141.7
    24-LCDD-243 3185622 542106 451.7 152 -48 147.4
    24-LCDD-244 3185955 542999 469.0 180 -41 267.75
    24-LCDD-245 3185692 542986 411.7 210 -60 100.65
    24-LCDD-246 3185649 542215 376.4 180 -50 95.4
    24-LCDD-247 3185704 542990 411.9 210 -75 80.0
    24-LCDD-248 3185616 542950 411.8 000 -43 107.85
    24-LCDD-249 3185629 542198 378.0 192 -57 109.2
    24-LCDD-250 3185664 542700 271.6 180 -0 119.0
    24-LCDD-251 3186089 542750 472.4 180 -53 551.65
    24-LCDD-252 3185739 543075 438.5 180 -40 89.7
    24-LCDD-253 3185666 542665 266.1 180 -29 84.45
    24-LCDD-254 3185849 542700 238.8 180 -66 217.15
    24-LCDD-255 3185691 542775 278.6 180 -10 75.95
    24-LCDD-256 3185467 542672 406.2 355 -50 164.45
    24-LCDD-257 3185911 542415 343.0 180 -58 278.45
    24-LCDD-258 3185691 542775 279.6 180 -15 78.3
    24-LCDD-259 3185529 542725 396.3 000 -41 132.45
    24-LCDD-260 3185686 542750 276.6 180 -7 81.75
    24-LCDD-261 3185717 543050 437.5 180 -40 52.45
    24-LCDD-262 3185676 542725 273.8 180 -15 98.25
    24-LCDD-263 3185570 542775 389.8 000 -42 47.25
    24-LCDD-264 3185834 542291 356.6 180 -51 279.95

     

    Table 2: Drill Hole Details

    Quality Assurance / Quality Control

    Core samples were shipped to ALS Limited in Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico, for sample preparation and for analysis at the ALS laboratory in North Vancouver. The Hermosillo and North Vancouver ALS facilities are ISO/IEC 17025 certified. Gold was assayed by 30-gram fire assay with atomic absorption spectroscopy finish and overlimits were analysed by 30-gram fire assay with gravimetric finish.

    Control samples comprising certified reference and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company’s quality assurance / quality control protocol.

    Statement of Qualified Person

    Gregg Bush, P.Eng. and Stewart Harris, P.Geo., the Company’s Qualified Persons, as such term is defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, have reviewed the scientific and technical information that forms the basis for this news release and has approved the disclosure herein. Mr. Bush is employed as Chief Operating Officer of the Company and Mr. Harris is employed as Exploration Manager of the Company.

    Technical Report Reference

    1 La Colorada Operations, Sonora, Mexico, NI 43-101 Technical Report (the ‘Report’) is dated January 11, 2024, has an effective date of December 4, 2024, and was prepared for Heliostar Metals Inc. by Mr. Todd Wakefield, RM SME, Mr. David Thomas, P.Geo., Mr. Jeffrey Choquette, P.E., Mr. Carl Defilippi, RM SME, and Ms. Dawn Garcia, CPG. The Report can be found under the Company’s profile on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) and on Heliostar’s website (www.heliostarmetals.com).

    About Heliostar Metals Ltd.

    Heliostar is a gold producer with production from operating mines in Mexico. This includes the La Colorada Mine in Sonora and San Agustin Mine in Durango. The Company also has a strong portfolio of development projects in Mexico and the USA. These include the Ana Paula project in Guerrero, the Cerro del Gallo project in Guanajuato, the San Antonio project in Baja Sur and the Unga project in Alaska, USA.

    FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:

    Charles Funk
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    Heliostar Metals Limited
    Email: charles.funk@heliostarmetals.com
    Phone: +1 844-753-0045

    Rob Grey
    Investor Relations Manager
    Heliostar Metals Limited
    Email: rob.grey@heliostarmetals.com
    Phone: +1 844-753-0045

     

    Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

    This news release includes certain ‘Forward-Looking Statements’ within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and ‘forward-looking information’ under applicable Canadian securities laws. When used in this news release, the words ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘target’, ‘plan’, ‘forecast’, ‘may’, ‘would’, ‘could’, ‘schedule’ and similar words or expressions, identify forward-looking statements or information. These forward-looking statements or information relate to, among other things, Continued success from assay results from shallow drilling in areas considered to be waste within the Creston Pit Expansion, Higher Grade intercepts demonstrate underground potential beyond the current open pit, the benefit of gold production at record prices, growth from the first significant investment into the project in many years, success to date in the shallow part of the pit could lower the upfront capital costs presented in the January 13th Technical Report, the Company will use the results of this drill program to finalize a Feasibility Study in mid-2025 and then make a decision to expand La Colorada to 50,000-100,000 ounces per year of annual production, hitting high grades and widths deeper intercepts could drive underground mining optionality beyond the open pit.

    Forward-looking statements and forward-looking information relating to the terms and completion of the Facility, any future mineral production, liquidity, and future exploration plans are based on management’s reasonable assumptions, estimates, expectations, analyses and opinions, which are based on management’s experience and perception of trends, current conditions and expected developments, and other factors that management believes are relevant and reasonable in the circumstances, but which may prove to be incorrect. Assumptions have been made regarding, among other things, the receipt of necessary approvals, price of metals; no escalation in the severity of public health crises or ongoing military conflicts; costs of exploration and development; the estimated costs of development of exploration projects; and the Company’s ability to operate in a safe and effective manner and its ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms.

    These statements reflect the Company’s respective current views with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon a number of other assumptions and estimates that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, political, and social uncertainties and contingencies. Many factors, both known and unknown, could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance or achievements that are or may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or forward-looking information and the Company has made assumptions and estimates based on or related to many of these factors. Such factors include, without limitation: precious metals price volatility; risks associated with the conduct of the Company’s mining activities in foreign jurisdictions; regulatory, consent or permitting delays; risks relating to reliance on the Company’s management team and outside contractors; risks regarding exploration and mining activities; the Company’s inability to obtain insurance to cover all risks, on a commercially reasonable basis or at all; currency fluctuations; risks regarding the failure to generate sufficient cash flow from operations; risks relating to project financing and equity issuances; risks and unknowns inherent in all mining projects, including the inaccuracy of reserves and resources, metallurgical recoveries and capital and operating costs of such projects; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties; laws and regulations governing the environment, health and safety; the ability of the communities in which the Company operates to manage and cope with the implications of public health crises; the economic and financial implications of public health crises, ongoing military conflicts and general economic factors to the Company; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities; employee relations, labour unrest or unavailability; the Company’s interactions with surrounding communities; the Company’s ability to successfully integrate acquired assets; the speculative nature of exploration and development, including the risks of diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; stock market volatility; conflicts of interest among certain directors and officers; lack of liquidity for shareholders of the Company; litigation risk; and the factors identified under the caption ‘Risk Factors’ in the Company’s public disclosure documents. Readers are cautioned against attributing undue certainty to forward-looking statements or forward-looking information. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended. The Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements or forward-looking information to reflect changes in assumptions or changes in circumstances or any other events affecting such statements or information, other than as required by applicable law.

    Corporate Logo

    To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/238940

    News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    (TheNewswire)

    Noble Mineral Exploration Inc.

    Toronto, Ontario January 30, 2025 TheNewswire – Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. ( ‘Noble’ or the ‘Company’ ) (TSX-V:NOB, FRANKFURT: NB7, OTCQB:NLPXF) is pleased to report acquisition of mining claims on a Uranium-Molybdenum prospect in Northern Quebec. The 10 claims were acquired by map staking to cover approximately 461 hectares and is called the Taser North Property

    The Taser North Project

    The Taser North Property, located in the Ungava Bay region of northern Quebec, approximately 130 km southeast of the community of Kangirsuk, is a significant exploration area for uranium mineralization. Historically Azimut Exploration Inc., in partnership with Majescor Resources Inc., explored the property in 2007 for its potential to host uranium mineralization. No work has been done since.

    The Taser North Property encompasses a variety of geological units, predominantly comprising high-grade metamorphic rocks such as gneisses and schists. These units have been intruded by granitic and pegmatitic bodies, which are potential hosts for uranium mineralization. The property is aligned along an extensive regional-scale uranium lake-bottom sediment anomaly referred to as the ‘Central Quebec Uranium Lineament,’ indicating a favourable environment for uranium mineralization.

    The 2007 work identified numerous uranium-bearing outcrops over a 35-km strike, with samples located on the Taser North property yielding grades up to 0.65% U O . In addition, molybdenum values up to 0.14% were found associated with the anomalous uranium.

    Individual uranium analyses include: 0.65%, 0.58%, 0.30%, 0.29%, 0.18%, 0.12%, 0.11%, and 0.10% over 2km of strike.

    Molybdenum analyses include: 0.14%, 0.13% 0.08% and 0.05%.

    The anomalous samples are located on the southwest flank of a northwest trending airborne radiometric high in uranium measuring 2.5km by 0.5km. In addition, a lake sediment sample taken from a lake southwest of the anomalous values on analysis measured 141 ppm uranium. (see Figure 1)


    Click Image To View Full Size

    Figure 1 – Taser North Project with property highlights on an Airborne Uranium Radiometric background.

    The Taser North Property exhibits significant potential for uranium mineralization, supported by its favourable geological setting and positive, historical exploration results. The identification of numerous priority targets and high-grade analyses underscore the property’s prospectivity. Further detailed prospecting, geological mapping, sampling, and drilling are recommended to fully assess and delineate the uranium potential of this property.

    Acquisition of Taser North property plus the recent acquisition of the Chateau Property (Noble Press Release dated January 17, 2025) demonstrates Noble’s commitment to exploring for critical minerals in Canada.

    Wayne Holmstead, P.Geo (OGQ), a ‘qualified person’ as such term is defined by National Instrument 43-101, has reviewed the data disclosed in this news release, and has otherwise reviewed and approved this technical information in this news release on behalf of Noble Minerals.

    About Noble Mineral Exploration Inc.

    Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. is a Canadian-based junior exploration company which, in addition to its holdings of securities in Canada Nickel Company Inc., Homeland Nickel Inc., Go Metals Corp. and MacDonald Mines Exploration Ltd., and its interest in the Holdsworth gold exploration property in the area of Wawa, Ontario, will continue to hold ~1700 ha in Thomas Twp in the Timmins area and ~175 ha of mining claims in Central Newfoundland.  It  also holds ~14,600 ha in the Nagagami Carbonatite Complex, and ~4,600 ha in the Boulder Project both near Hearst, Ontario, as well as ~3,700 ha in the Buckingham Graphite Property, ~10,152 ha in the Havre St Pierre  Nickel, Copper, PGM property, ~1,573 ha in the Cere-Villebon Nickel, Copper, PGM property, and ~569 ha in the Kitivik area U 3 O 8 and REE’s property all of which are in the province of Quebec.

    More detailed information is available on the website at: https://www.noblemineralexploration.com

    Noble’s common shares trade on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol ‘NOB.’

    Cautionary Statement

    Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein.

    The foregoing information may contain forward-looking statements relating to the future performance of Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. Forward-looking statements, specifically those concerning future performance, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from the Company’s plans and expectations. These plans, expectations, risks, and uncertainties are detailed herein and from time to time in the filings made by the Company with the TSX Venture Exchange and securities regulators. Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. does not assume any obligation to update or revise its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    Contacts:

    H. Vance White, President

    Phone:        416-214-2250

    Fax:        416-367-1954

    Email: info@noblemineralexploration.com

    Investor Relations

    Email: ir@noblemineralexploration.com   

    Copyright (c) 2025 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

    News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    (TheNewswire)

    Noble Mineral Exploration Inc.

    Toronto, Ontario January 30, 2025 TheNewswire – Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. ( ‘Noble’ or the ‘Company’ ) (TSX-V:NOB, FRANKFURT: NB7, OTCQB:NLPXF) is pleased to report acquisition of mining claims on a Uranium-Molybdenum prospect in Northern Quebec. The 10 claims were acquired by map staking to cover approximately 461 hectares and is called the Taser North Property

    The Taser North Project

    The Taser North Property, located in the Ungava Bay region of northern Quebec, approximately 130 km southeast of the community of Kangirsuk, is a significant exploration area for uranium mineralization. Historically Azimut Exploration Inc., in partnership with Majescor Resources Inc., explored the property in 2007 for its potential to host uranium mineralization. No work has been done since.

    The Taser North Property encompasses a variety of geological units, predominantly comprising high-grade metamorphic rocks such as gneisses and schists. These units have been intruded by granitic and pegmatitic bodies, which are potential hosts for uranium mineralization. The property is aligned along an extensive regional-scale uranium lake-bottom sediment anomaly referred to as the ‘Central Quebec Uranium Lineament,’ indicating a favourable environment for uranium mineralization.

    The 2007 work identified numerous uranium-bearing outcrops over a 35-km strike, with samples located on the Taser North property yielding grades up to 0.65% U O . In addition, molybdenum values up to 0.14% were found associated with the anomalous uranium.

    Individual uranium analyses include: 0.65%, 0.58%, 0.30%, 0.29%, 0.18%, 0.12%, 0.11%, and 0.10% over 2km of strike.

    Molybdenum analyses include: 0.14%, 0.13% 0.08% and 0.05%.

    The anomalous samples are located on the southwest flank of a northwest trending airborne radiometric high in uranium measuring 2.5km by 0.5km. In addition, a lake sediment sample taken from a lake southwest of the anomalous values on analysis measured 141 ppm uranium. (see Figure 1)


    Click Image To View Full Size

    Figure 1 – Taser North Project with property highlights on an Airborne Uranium Radiometric background.

    The Taser North Property exhibits significant potential for uranium mineralization, supported by its favourable geological setting and positive, historical exploration results. The identification of numerous priority targets and high-grade analyses underscore the property’s prospectivity. Further detailed prospecting, geological mapping, sampling, and drilling are recommended to fully assess and delineate the uranium potential of this property.

    Acquisition of Taser North property plus the recent acquisition of the Chateau Property (Noble Press Release dated January 17, 2025) demonstrates Noble’s commitment to exploring for critical minerals in Canada.

    Wayne Holmstead, P.Geo (OGQ), a ‘qualified person’ as such term is defined by National Instrument 43-101, has reviewed the data disclosed in this news release, and has otherwise reviewed and approved this technical information in this news release on behalf of Noble Minerals.

    About Noble Mineral Exploration Inc.

    Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. is a Canadian-based junior exploration company which, in addition to its holdings of securities in Canada Nickel Company Inc., Homeland Nickel Inc., Go Metals Corp. and MacDonald Mines Exploration Ltd., and its interest in the Holdsworth gold exploration property in the area of Wawa, Ontario, will continue to hold ~1700 ha in Thomas Twp in the Timmins area and ~175 ha of mining claims in Central Newfoundland.  It  also holds ~14,600 ha in the Nagagami Carbonatite Complex, and ~4,600 ha in the Boulder Project both near Hearst, Ontario, as well as ~3,700 ha in the Buckingham Graphite Property, ~10,152 ha in the Havre St Pierre  Nickel, Copper, PGM property, ~1,573 ha in the Cere-Villebon Nickel, Copper, PGM property, and ~569 ha in the Kitivik area U 3 O 8 and REE’s property all of which are in the province of Quebec.

    More detailed information is available on the website at: https://www.noblemineralexploration.com

    Noble’s common shares trade on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol ‘NOB.’

    Cautionary Statement

    Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein.

    The foregoing information may contain forward-looking statements relating to the future performance of Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. Forward-looking statements, specifically those concerning future performance, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from the Company’s plans and expectations. These plans, expectations, risks, and uncertainties are detailed herein and from time to time in the filings made by the Company with the TSX Venture Exchange and securities regulators. Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. does not assume any obligation to update or revise its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    Contacts:

    H. Vance White, President

    Phone:        416-214-2250

    Fax:        416-367-1954

    Email: info@noblemineralexploration.com

    Investor Relations

    Email: ir@noblemineralexploration.com   

    Copyright (c) 2025 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

    News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Tesla’s fourth-quarter earnings report lands just over a week after President Donald Trump began his second term in the White House, with Elon Musk right by his side.

    Now that the Tesla CEO is firmly planted in Washington, D.C., in a high-profile advisory role, shareholders in the electric vehicle maker have some questions.

    On the forum Tesla uses to solicit investor inquiries in advance of its earnings calls, more than 100 poured in from shareholders about Musk’s politics, including his official role at Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and his endorsement of far-right candidates.

    “How much time does Elon Musk devote to growing Tesla, solving product issues, and driving shareholder value vs. his public engagements with Trump, DOGE, and political activities?” one retail investor asked, adding, “Do you believe he’s providing Tesla the focus it needs?”

    In addition to contributing $270 million to help Trump and other Republican candidates and causes, Musk spent weeks on the campaign trail during the fourth quarter working to propel Trump back into the White House. After Trump’s election victory, Musk then spent considerable time far away from Tesla’s factory floor at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.

    One of the top-voted questions about Musk asked how much time he intends to spend “at the White House and on government activities vs time and effort dedicated to Tesla.”

    Musk and Tesla didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Musk has also involved himself in German politics, giving a full-throated endorsement of the country’s far-right, anti-immigrant party AfD (Alternative für Deutschland) in December ahead of the February election.

    According to research and consulting firm Brand Finance, the value of Tesla’s brand fell by 26% last year, with factors including Musk’s “antagonism,” Tesla’s aging lineup of EVs and more. The researchers found that fewer consumers would recommend or consider buying a Tesla now than in previous years.

    During public remarks following last week’s inauguration, Musk repeatedly used a gesture that was viewed by many historians and politicians as a Nazi salute. Ruth Ben-Ghiat, whose scholarship has focused on fascism, described it as “a Nazi salute and a very belligerent one,” while neo-Nazis praised Musk for his antics.

    A shareholder on Say asked, “Will you apologize for the misunderstanding that occurred when you made the hand gesture thanking folks for their support. It would go a long way with your investors and the American public at large. Thanking you in advance Elon!”

    In response to the criticism, Musk said anyone calling the salute a hateful gesture was pushing a “hoax.” But after that, he engaged in Nazi-themed word play on X, prompting the Anti-Defamation League to rebuke him, writing it is “inappropriate and offensive to make light” of the “singularly evil” Holocaust. And Musk later appeared via video at a rally for the AfD in Halle, Germany.

    Some investors asked whether Tesla had “sales lost due to political activities of Elon,” how the company plans “to respond to Musk’s now infamous Nazi salute,” and how Tesla “is addressing the negative impacts of Elon’s public views and activities.”

    But Tesla is under no obligation to bring any of these topics up on the earnings call. Ahead of the third-quarter call in October, investors had a lot of questions and concerns about similar issues regarding Musk’s involvement in politics, though that was before Trump’s election victory.

    Trump was never mentioned on that call.

    This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    On Sunday, President Donald Trump whipped Colombian President Gustavo Petro into compliance by threatening 25% tariffs on Colombian goods and other economic measures for refusing to accept a U.S. military aircraft carrying illegal migrants whom Trump wanted deported back to Colombia. 

    The Colombia case provides a glimpse into Trump’s mindset and how he will conduct his foreign policy from now on.

    Economic warfare and ‘disabuse others from being tempted’ will be the key tenets of Trump’s playbook for his foreign policy during his second term. And that is a stark difference from the foreign policy approach used by the Biden-Harris team and other previous administrations.

    Traditionally, before Trump, Washington has relied on ideology, appeasement, foreign aid and thoughtless use of military power when it came to international relations. This misguided albeit bipartisan approach that guided U.S. statecraft for more than a quarter of a century has made America poorer, less safe and disrespected on the world stage. Moreover, it destabilized some parts of the world, such as the Middle East.

    Gone are the days when American servicemen and women will be casually deployed to democratize every nook and cranny of the world and giving their lives for someone else’s freedom. The ultimate realpolitik-minded statesman, Trump adheres to the ‘respect equals fear’ philosophy underpinned by a purely transactional approach. The Donald is not afraid of being perceived as a bully. He seems to prefer it.

    Beware Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, the ‘Rocketman’ and the ayatollahs. 

    To understand Trump’s ‘disabuse others from being tempted’ doctrine, let’s take a look at Russian Czar Peter the Great, who in 1718 tortured to death his own son for allegedly conspiring against him. Seeking to modernize Russia into a European country, Peter in 1698 introduced a tax on beards, to make Russian men look and act more like Westerners. 

    The Russian authoritarian, who ruled Russia from 1696 until his death in 1725, also issued a series of imperial edicts, which mandated capital punishment conducted publicly for certain crimes, to deter criminal acts. The edict on trade mandated that ‘one merchant is hanged each year to disabuse others from being tempted.’ ‘Trade [in fish, sugar, and gold] is an affair of thieves,’ was the justification used in the decree, implying that everyone involved in trade was a thief, so to reduce theft, others must be deterred by punishing someone publicly.

    By executive order, Trump has already put all foreign aid on hold, worldwide, including to Ukraine. Only Israel and Egypt were exempted. He threatened tariffs on China, insisted on buying Greenland, suggested making Canada the 51st state, and told Putin to end his ‘ridiculous’ war in Ukraine or face more sanctions. The bombastic commander in chief warned Hamas and implicitly its backer Iran that ‘all hell will break loose’ if the hostages in Gaza are not released.

    All of this rhetoric is intended to unbalance our enemies and make clear that America is serious about its own security and prosperity first. It will no longer lecture Putin how to treat Russians or Xi Jinping how to govern China. But it will unleash the full force of economic warfare, if they don’t fall in compliance.

    Trump is also signaling to U.S. partners, such as some NATO members who haven’t fully paid their membership dues, that America will no longer be taken advantage of. He will likely enforce his request that NATO dues are raised to 5% of GDP instead of 2%.

    Trump is thinking big. He wants to transform the way America conducts its foreign affairs and even military strategy. Thinking is Trump’s lifelong credo. ‘I like thinking big, I always have. To me, it’s very simple. If you’re going to be thinking anyway, you might as well think big,’ he declared in 1987, well before entering politics, when promoting his book ‘The Art of the Deal.’

    What kind of deal Trump will be able to make depends on how well Trump and his team understand how Putin, Xi and the ayatollahs think and what drives them. For most of them, their national interest, goals and ambitions surpass economic concerns. Let’s hope that Team Trump understands how these foreign leaders and their people think. They don’t think like Americans.

    This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

    Tulsi Gabbard doesn’t currently have enough votes to advance out of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Fox News Digital has learned. 

    The former Democrat representative’s nomination to be director of national intelligence (DNI) under President Donald Trump is in danger as she lacks enough Republican support on the committee, sources confirmed.

    Before heading to the Senate floor for a confirmation vote, Trump’s picks all have hearings and their nominations are voted on at the committee level. Gabbard’s confirmation hearing will take place at 10 a.m. Thursday.

    So far, no Trump nominees have failed to advance out of their respective committees. 

    A senior Intel Committee aide confirmed to Fox News Digital that Gabbard does not currently have a majority of its members’ votes, which are necessary to move to the full Senate. 

    According to the source, half of the Republicans on the coveted committee are not sold on Trump’s DNI pick. 

    A Senate source familiar told Fox News Digital, ‘Some members are undecided.’

    ‘Not true that [they] are NOs,’ they clarified. 

    The source confirmed that the undecided senators in question are Republicans. 

    A spokesperson for Gabbard told Fox News Digital in a statement, ‘Anonymous sources are going to continue to lie and smear to try and take down the President’s nominees and subvert the will of the American people and the media is playing a role in publishing these lies. That doesn’t change the fact that Lt. Col. Gabbard is immensely qualified for this role and we look forward to her hearing.’

    The senior committee aide shared that the reasons for GOP uncertainty include her previous Section 702 stance, her past meeting with former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and her past defense of Edward Snowden.

    ‘It’s about judgment,’ they said. 

    Gabbard will likely need every Republican vote to move past the committee, assuming Democrats will vote against her. 

    Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., serves as chair of the committee alongside other Republican members Jim Risch of Idaho, Susan Collins of Maine, John Cornyn of Texas, Jerry Moran of Kansas, James Lankford of Oklahoma, Mike Rounds of South Dakota, Todd Young of Indiana and Ted Budd of North Carolina.

    Lankford recently came out in support of Gabbard after she reversed her position on a controversial intelligence gathering tool known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

    Neither the White House nor Cotton’s office provided comments to Fox News Digital in time for publication. 

    Fox News Digital reached out to multiple Republican Senate offices for comment. 

    As Gabbard’s confirmation fate hangs in the balance, there is reportedly a push by some Trump-aligned Republican senators to waive the committee’s rules in order to open the vote on Gabbard’s nomination, as Politico reported. This would mean each senator’s vote is accessible to the public. 

    The Intel Committee’s rules stipulate that the vote is conducted in a closed meeting and a tally is released afterward. The vote is expected to go forward in a closed manner, in accordance with the rules.

    This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

    Conservatives on social media rallied around Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday as the Trump nominee for secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) faced questions from senators in his confirmation hearing.

    ‘RFK crushed it,’ conservative commentator Charlie Kirk posted on X. ‘Very proud of him. Confirm him, now!’

    ‘RFK killed it today,’ RNC national committeewoman Amy Kremer posted on X.’ So proud of him! LFG.’

    ‘RFK Jr is crushing this hearing,’ former GOP Rep. Scott Taylor posted on X. ‘Dems look unhinged and very petty. America is sicker, more obese, and more unhealthy than ever. Something has to change!’

    ‘The room ERUPTED in applause IMMEDIATELY after RFK Jr’s confirmation hearing concluded,’ conservative commentator Benny Johnson posted on X. ‘Confirm him.’

    Former NCAA swimmer and conservative commentator Riley Gaines posted on X that ‘the Dems embarrassed themselves today.’

    ‘Confirm RFK!!!!’ Gaines wrote.

    ‘Absolute masterclass,’ Trump 2024 Deputy Rapid Response Director Greg Price posted on X during the hearing.

    Verbal fireworks exploded minutes into the Senate Finance Committee hearing on Wednesday, the first of two straight days of congressional confirmation hearings for the controversial vaccine skeptic and environmental crusader who ran for the White House in 2024 before ending his bid and endorsing Trump.

    Kennedy repeatedly insisted that he was not ‘anti-vaccine’ and slammed multiple Democratic senators for pushing a ‘dishonest’ narrative against him that he has ‘corrected’ on national television many times. Democrats on the committee pointed to a slew of past comments from the nominee in which he questioned or disparaged COVID shots and other vaccines.

    Kennedy returns to Capitol Hill on Thursday for a hearing in front of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. It is considered a courtesy hearing as only the Senate Finance Committee will vote on Kennedy’s confirmation.

    With Republicans controlling the Senate by a 53-47 majority, Kennedy can only afford to lose the support of three GOP senators if Democrats unite against his confirmation. During Wednesday’s hearing, no Republicans appeared to oppose the nomination.

    Fox News Digital’s Paul Steinhauser contributed to this report.

    This post appeared first on FOX NEWS